Temporary residence vs permanent establishment risk
You move to an EU country on a temporary basis. The stay is framed as short-term: temporary residence permit, limited lease, no declared intention to settle. At the same time, you continue to run a business, manage a company, or perform core commercial activities remotely. You assume that temporary residence status limits tax exposure and that business taxation remains tied to the country of incorporation or formal seat. In practice, tax authorities assess what you actually do, not how long you planned to stay or how the residence permit is labelled. As a result, business activity carried out during a “temporary” stay may be treated as creating a permanent establishment.
Input Data
- Status: temporary resident or short-term stay permit
- Duration: several months, renewable or extended
- Business activity: management, decision-making, revenue-generating work
- Company location: incorporated in another country
- Clients / operations: cross-border
- Work pattern: performed physically from the host country
- Assumption: temporary stay excludes business tax presence
Jurisdiction Conflict
Host country — permanent establishment asserted
- Core business activities performed locally
- Management or decision-making exercised in-country
- Regular and non-ancillary activity detected
Company country — taxation retained
- Company legally incorporated and registered
- Formal seat and filings unchanged
- Income already taxed or reported
Qualification mismatch
- Temporary immigration status vs factual business presence
- Different tests for residence and permanent establishment
- Same income viewed through individual and corporate lenses
The conflict is not about how long the residence permit lasts. It is about whether the activity carried out locally crosses the threshold of a taxable business presence.
AI Analysis
Scenario A — Fixed place permanent establishment
- Home or rented accommodation treated as business location
- Regular business activity carried out
- Risk: local corporate income taxation
Scenario B — Management permanent establishment
- Key decisions made from the host country
- Effective place of management challenged
- Risk: reallocation of profits
Scenario C — Dependent agent exposure
- Contracts negotiated or concluded locally
- Economic dependence identified
- Risk: attribution of business income
Key risk indicators
- Repeated or extended "temporary" stays
- Daily management activity performed locally
- Use of local infrastructure for business
- Contractual authority exercised in-country
- Lack of separation between personal stay and business activity
- Documentation focused only on immigration status
Output of Richys AI Analysis
- Mapping of activities by location
- Assessment of permanent establishment triggers
- Classification of activity: preparatory vs core
- Profit attribution risk estimation
- Identification of documentation gaps
- Conflict points requiring expert validation
Expert Boundary
Involvement of a verified EU expert is required for:
- country-specific permanent establishment thresholds
- interpretation of management and agency tests
- profit attribution methodology
- defensive positioning toward tax authorities
Case Conclusion
Temporary residence does not mean temporary tax exposure. What matters is not the label of your stay, but the substance of the activity performed while you are there.
When immigration status and business reality diverge, tax authorities follow the activity. Income that appears safely offshore can be reclassified as locally taxable through a permanent establishment.
A structured case analysis clarifies where business presence may be deemed to exist, which assumptions fail under scrutiny, and where expert intervention is required before assessments, reallocations, or penalties arise.
Start case analysisThis case is for illustration purposes only. Real outcomes depend on residence, income structure, documents and timing. For your specific situation, use structured case analysis with AI and verified EU experts.